Skip to main content

Florida Career College to Close

Florida Career College to Close Doug Lederman Fri, 01/26/2024 - 03:00 AM Byline(s) Doug Lederman from Inside Higher Ed https://ift.tt/avZRfLi

Southern Poverty Law Center's divisive tactics (letter)

To the editor:

In today’s fast-moving media environment, it’s easy to see how well-meaning reporters and editors can overlook a detail or assume the validity of a well-traveled claim.

This was the case in a March 23 article published at Inside Higher Ed. In an otherwise solid and factual report entitled “Law Students Shout Down Controversial Speakers,” reporter Josh Moody detailed the disgraceful scene of Yale Law School students imposing an unseemly heckler’s veto on my colleague at Alliance Defending Freedom, Kristen Waggoner, and her co-panelist, Monica Miller of the American Humanist Association.

I won’t belabor the details of this unsettling event, as Mr. Moody does an excellent job in his coverage. But I will point out to readers that Mr. Moody makes one foundational error regarding ADF and the public smear campaign currently waged against us by the thoroughly discredited, internally corrupt, and deeply partisan Southern Poverty Law Center.

For decades, many prominent voices have been warning that SPLC has become “more of a partisan progressive hit operation than a civil rights watchdog.” Current Affairs’ editor Nathan J. Robinson described SPLC’s “Hate Map” as an “outright fraud” and “willful deception” and SPLC itself as “everything that’s wrong with liberalism.” Shikha Dalmia has said that SPLC is wrongly focused on “enforcing liberal orthodoxy against its intellectual opponents.” SPLC was even forced to pay over $3 million to settle a threatened defamation lawsuit over its slander.

Yet, despite this, Mr. Moody writes that ADF has “earned” the spurious “hate group” designation from the SPLC and that ADF “has long been criticized for social views that demonize the LGBTQ+ community.”

The opposite is true. It is the SPLC that seeks to demonize those who hold views about marriage and human sexuality with which they disagree. That is why they place such groups and individuals on their “Hate Map.” ADF supports orthodox Christian teaching on marriage, sexuality, and the nature of the human person. Our beliefs are consistent with Biblical, historical understandings of Christianity, held by all major denominations including Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant and adhered to by billions worldwide. Accordingly, we support laws and policy positions in line with these beliefs. Over the years – in keeping with the shrill cancel culture that has taken hold in the U.S. – those who disagree with our policy positions have deliberately sought to mischaracterize, smear, and outright lie about our work in order to silence debate on these issues. SPLC is the most prominent example.

ADF’s 13 wins at the U.S. Supreme Court just since 2011 should be proof enough to any skeptic that our views are well within the mainstream. We have another important free speech case before the Court in the coming term, and Ms. Waggoner was invited to the Yale Law School event because she successfully argued a recent campus free speech case before the Court—one in which the American Humanist Association filed a brief supporting ADF’s client.

Strikingly, none of this context was included in Mr. Moody’s reporting. Neither was the concerning connection between SPLC’s rhetoric and threatening and violent behavior on college campuses and beyond. In just the last decade, students at Yale and Middlebury College have cited SPLC statements as a reason for boisterous and violent shout downs of campus speakers and Floyd Corkins cited SPLC claims as motivation for his attempted mass murder at Family Research Council. These are major omissions to an otherwise thorough report. Inside Higher Ed’s readers deserve the full context so they can come to their own conclusions about the conduct and motivation of the student disruptors at Yale.

--Jeremy Tedesco
Senior counsel and senior vice president of corporate engagement

Alliance Defending Freedom.

Editorial Tags: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Disable left side advertisement?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Live Updates: 
liveupdates0
Most Popular: 
3
In-Article Advertisement High: 
6
In-Article related stories: 
9
In-Article Advertisement Low: 
12


from Inside Higher Ed https://ift.tt/p0vIlH8

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Is Middle School So Hard for So Many People?

Middle school. The very memory of it prompts disgust. Here’s a thing no one’s thinking: Geez, I wish I still looked the way I did when I was 12. Middle school is the worst. Tweenhood, which starts around age 9 , is horrifying for a few reasons. For one, the body morphs in weird and scary ways. Certain parts expand faster than others, sometimes so fast that they cause literal growing pains; hair grows in awkward locations, often accompanied by awkward smells. And many kids face new schools and a new set of rules for how to act, both socially and academically. But middle school doesn’t have to be like this. It could be okay. It could be good , even. After all, middle schoolers are “kind of the best people on Earth,” says Mayra Cruz, the principal of Oyster-Adams Bilingual School, a public middle school in Washington, D.C. The notion that middle school deserves its own educational ecosystem at all dates back to the 1960s , with a campaign to better accommodate the specific learning ne...

Debacle over review reveals racism in academy (opinion)

When medievalist Mary Rambaran-Olm wrote about having her book review “torpedoed” for not being “more generous” to the book’s authors, no one could have expected that this would send shock waves across the academic community in what became an online maelstrom revealing the extent of white academic gatekeeping, ally performativity and blatant racism. For those of us who work on decentering whiteness in premodern fields such as classics, medieval/early modern studies, archaeology and in or on the Global South, this latest attack targeting a scholar of color exposed what many of us have been trying to draw attention to for years—that racism is deep and pernicious in the so-called liberal and woke academy. Rambaran-Olm was commissioned to review The Bright Ages: A New History of Medieval Europe ( HarperCollins ) for the Los Angeles Review of Books because of her expertise in early English medieval literature and history, and because she is one of the leading scholars challenging the...